Igreja de Nossa Senhora do Rosarrio de Fátima – Lisbon

The striking modern design of Igreja de Nossa Senhora do Rosarrio de Fátima (Church of Our Lady of the Rosary of Fátima) in Lisbon, with its plain, mostly white exterior, single geometrically shaped tower and horizontal roof, caused a stir and heated public debate when it was built. Unlike older churches it is surrounded by a plaza, setting it back from its surroundings. Some critics argued that it resembled a factory more than a place of worship. On the eve of its consecration, the newspaper Diário de Notícias (the unofficial voice of the regime), published an interview with architect Porfírio Pardal Monteiro, which focused on the theme of national regeneration. One that was regularly employed by the Salazar regime to strengthen its appeal for national unity.

This project was one of the most important projects commissioned by the SPN during its first years of existence. Inaugurated twenty-one years after the miracle of the sun was witnessed by an estimated crowd of between 50,000 and 70,000 people in October 1917 near the small village of Fátima, where witnesses reported seeing the sun, not only lose its heat and light, but also danced from one horizon to the other. Of the three shepherd children, who first reported seeing the Virgin Mary on 13 May 1917, it was only Lúcia who was able to see, hear, and speak to the Virgin, and who asked for a miracle to occur. This miracle came at a time when the church and state did not have a good relationship.

During the constitutional monarchy (1820-1910) the rights and property of religious orders were severely curtailed, but there was no move to separate church and state until 1911, shortly after the proclamation of the Republic. A series of anticlerical measures followed the change in government, which included the nationalisation of church property, the elimination of religious holidays, and closing Catholic schools and seminaries. This resulted in a strong pushback from the people, one which Salazar took advantage of by siding with the Catholic opposition groups. Despite the fact that he never reunited the church and state during his rule, he did defend its values and spoke out against the forces of evil that threatened to destabilize Portuguese society.

Pilgrimages to the site began in 1923, even though it took the Vatican more than a decade to officially recognise the apparitions as legitimate. With Salazar’s rise to power the site and miracle gained government support.

During the rule of the First Republic, anticlerical sentiment was the strongest among Lisbon’s middle and working classes, and as no new churches had been consecrated in the city since the turn of the century, the time was right to build a new church in line with the current mood of the time. It was decided to build it on the city’s expanding northern border to the west of Avenida da República in a parish whose residents were from Lisbon’s privileged classes.

Just like the contest to find the most Portuguese village in Portugal, this project presented itself as an opportunity for Portugal’s leaders to address various issues at the same time. One of which was to help mend the damage that was done by the previous government’s anticlerical policies, as well as trying to bridge the urban-rural divide prevalent at the time. As the figure of Our Lady of Fátima was most revered by rural people, the church dedicated to her was an attempt to stand as a symbol to unite the various segments of the population through their shared devotion to the Virgin. 

The views and ideals of the future regeneration of the nation was often closely linked with the Fátima miracle. Books at the time carried titles like Fátima e o Ressurgimento de Portugal in 1938 (Fátima and the Resurgence of Portugal) and Fátima e a Redenção de Portugal in 1939 (Fátima and the Redemption of Portugal).

It was the first of many collaborations between architect Porfírio Pardal Monteiro and the artist and writer José de Almada Negreiros. They were both recommended to Salazar by António Ferro in 1932. Trained before the formation of the Estado Novo, their creative intentions were not always in line with the views and ideals of the conservative factions that were taking over the artistic direction of the regime, but they were eager to participate in the government’s public works projects to benefit financially. Despite this, they did not hesitate to push their artistic independence, even though it meant that they, as a result, were sometimes forced to modify certain design elements to suit the conservative aesthetic.

Monteiro’s design included frescos and stained-glass windows depicting allegorical scenes, as well as organizing the central nave around a diagonal pointed arch. In doing so he confirmed his willingness to accommodate some aspects of traditional religious structures, while at the same time reimagining these traditional religious elements. He chose José de Almada Negreiros to design the stained-glass windows, who at the time was known as a provocateur. When designing the windows he softened the lines of his more radical modernist experiments from before, and reworked and invoked traditional images forming part of Portuguese collective memory into the religious designs.

The inclusion of interesting details like an anchor, prow, nets and oar of a typical Portuguese fishing boat, as well as an image of a caravel enriched the religious encounter with a culturally specific view of the Portuguese experience. The inclusion of three contemporary secular figures at the bottom of another window – a woman harvesting wheat; a male factory worker; and a male writer – not only illustrates the artist’s sense of individual creativity, but the images demonstrated that the hardworking povo would receive the Virgin’s divine protection, an idea that was strongly promoted by the Estado Novo’s conservative social values.

In accordance with Monteiro’s regenerative theme, Almada reworked medieval themes and techniques into his designs, despite the windows being modernist in their composition. Their content was in line with the Estado Novo’s ideological ideas, and consistent with the state’s inclination to promote folkloric images of religious practice.

During the consecration ceremony Cardinal Cerejeira praised the church’s “eternal beauty in the artistic language of our time”, but it appears that some of the stained glass designs were changed by the Cardinal to, as the newspaper Díario de Notícias put it, “. . . correcting less than beautiful lines, diminishing harsh shadows, impressing more spirituality on the design and representation of biblical figures, modifying the tone of the colours, tempering their intensity . . .”

The Igreja de Nossa Senhora do Rosarrio de Fátima set a precedent in the design of religious structures, which meant that other modernist-inspired churches were built throughout Portugal and its colonies as a result.

Notes:
# The church was concecrated on 13 October 1938.
# Cardinal Cerejeira, the bishop of Lisbon at the time when the church was built, was a close friend and adviser of Salazar.
# Lúcia became a Carmelite nun, and passed away at the age of 97 in February 2005. The other two children who witnessed the miracle, Francisco and Marta, died shortly after the sightings in 1919 and 1920 respectively.
# Porfírio Pardal Monteiro received the prestigious Valmor Prize for the best building constructed in 1938 for his design of the church.
# Portugal’s monarchy came to an end in 1910 with the 5 October Revolution, when it was overthrown, and became a republic. This period, known as the First Republic was a chaotic and unstable time, and lasted from 1910 -1926, when on 28 May a coup d’état brought it to an end. The transition period, referred to as Ditadura Militar (Military Dictatorship: 1926-1928), saw several coup attempts, and was followed by the Ditadura Nacional (National Dictatorship) from 1928-1933. In 1933 it changed its name to Estado Novo (New State), and together these three are referred to as the Second Republic, which lasted from 1926-1974, the longest ruling authoritarian regime in Western Europe, when on 25 April the Carnation Revolution brought democracy to the country.  

Reference:
Consensus and Debate in Salazar’s Portugal: Visual and Literary Negotiations of the National Text, 1933–1948  by Ellen W. Sapega

Portuguese Words:
igreja – church
arquiteto (m) / arquiteta (f) – architect
artista – artist
escritor (m) / escritora (f) – writer

Written by: Jolandi

8 comments on “Igreja de Nossa Senhora do Rosarrio de Fátima – Lisbon

  1. I find the white colour and simple, clean design very striking, but I can see how it would have raised eyebrows back then. It’s hard to believe it was built in 1938—it looks modern even today (or at least retro-modern). Interesting background.

    • It is so true of how difficult it is for people in general to accept change on so many different levels. Art and architecture can often be described as ugly, when they are first conceived, but receive enormous praise later. I agree with you that it still looks modern today. – Jolandi

  2. I must say the brutalist lines of this church invoked in me an immediate response to the Soviet era, which of course, sought to stamp out religion and any belief in an intangible spiritual force. So, despite the religious bas-relief iconography and statue of La Madonna, going by the photos at least, I would view worshipping there as something of a conundrum.
    And if they didn’t know the translation, I would imagine the average English speaker would quip, ‘what are all these words doing together “Igreja de Nossa Senhora do Rosarrio de Fátima”.’
    Thank you for bringing our attention to the background ~ always so much to learn…

    • I love how you would view worshipping there as a conundrum, Gwen. It certainly emphasises the criticism the church received when it was built. I love how architecture can illicit a strong emotional response. – Jolandi

  3. Some of the architectural elements of this church remind me of one of the churches I saw in East Timor, although I think it was the Indonesian government who built the latter. As we know, authorities across the globe often portray themselves as religious or at least caring for religious communities to gain support from the locals. This is such an interesting history of a structure I would’ve otherwise never known, Jolandi.

    • How fascinating, Bama. You are so right about how governments want to portray themselves to garner support. I love how there are always more layers to any story or building than meet the eye. Like you, I enjoy digging a bit deeper. – Jolandi

  4. I, too, hesitated to appreciate this architecture until I read the background and saw how much thought and care went into the design. Possibly I could appreciate more buildings if I knew more about the choices that went into their construction. The history is so interesting, and while I am sad for the untimely deaths of Francisco and Marta, I am glad to hear that Lucia lived to see the events acknowledged officially, and to see a monument to all that happened, and its implications, constructed. It seems as though this event in her young life would have been part of the reason for dedicating her life to her faith.

    • I completely agree – it is mostly the stories that make buildings more interesting to me, Crystal.
      Yes, the story of Lucia and the other two children are facinating. There is a movie called Fatima that came out a couple of months ago, but I haven’t watched it yet. Definitely on my bucket list. – Jolandi

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *